Difference between revisions of "User talk:Pauli"
From OpenSSLWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 10: | Line 10: | ||
: Shouldn't this be discussed on the discussion tab of the page that was changed? That would probably make it a little easier for the rest of us to understand what's going on, rather than this random discussion added to a user page that doesn't even exist... | : Shouldn't this be discussed on the discussion tab of the page that was changed? That would probably make it a little easier for the rest of us to understand what's going on, rather than this random discussion added to a user page that doesn't even exist... | ||
: --[[User:Levitte|Levitte]] ([[User talk:Levitte|talk]]) 03:57, 15 September 2019 (UTC) | : --[[User:Levitte|Levitte]] ([[User talk:Levitte|talk]]) 03:57, 15 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :: Yeah, I was trying to have a sidebar to encourage an edit. Sorry about that. | ||
+ | :: | ||
+ | :: [[User:Jwalton|Jwalton]] ([[User talk:Jwalton|talk]]) 04:00, 15 September 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:00, 15 September 2019
KDF Changes
I think the [modified] KDF example may be too new for most users of OpenSSL. For example, it appears OSSL_PARAM is part of an upcoming release: https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/man3/OSSL_PARAM.html .
I think the new example is going to cause confusion for most users rather than helping them. Also, answers on Stack Overflow a pointing back to the wiki and the old example.
Perhaps you can add the new example as a distinct second example, and clearly state it is part of the OpenSSL 3.0 API.
Jwalton (talk) 00:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- Shouldn't this be discussed on the discussion tab of the page that was changed? That would probably make it a little easier for the rest of us to understand what's going on, rather than this random discussion added to a user page that doesn't even exist...
- --Levitte (talk) 03:57, 15 September 2019 (UTC)