Difference between revisions of "Commercial Product Disclaimer"

From OpenSSLWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Mention of commercial or proprietary products or services in this wiki should not be construed as endorsement by the OpenSSL Software Foundation, the OpenSSL project, or the Open…")
 
m (Spelling correction)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Mention of commercial or proprietary products or services in this wiki should not be construed as endorsement by the OpenSSL Software Foundation, the OpenSSL project, or the OpenSSLWiki community.
 
Mention of commercial or proprietary products or services in this wiki should not be construed as endorsement by the OpenSSL Software Foundation, the OpenSSL project, or the OpenSSLWiki community.
  
Reference to such products and services is permissible when restricted to factually verificable information appropriate in the current context. Citations to independent sources is usually appropriate. Vendors claims should be specifically identified with "According to [vendor name]..." or similar qualifications and should be specific and relevant to the immediate topic of discussion.
+
Reference to such products and services is permissible when restricted to factually verifiable information appropriate in the current context. Citations to independent sources is usually appropriate. Vendors claims should be specifically identified with "According to [vendor name]..." or similar qualifications and should be specific and relevant to the immediate topic of discussion.
  
 
Advertising spam will be quickly and ruthlessly removed.
 
Advertising spam will be quickly and ruthlessly removed.

Revision as of 13:44, 9 March 2013

Mention of commercial or proprietary products or services in this wiki should not be construed as endorsement by the OpenSSL Software Foundation, the OpenSSL project, or the OpenSSLWiki community.

Reference to such products and services is permissible when restricted to factually verifiable information appropriate in the current context. Citations to independent sources is usually appropriate. Vendors claims should be specifically identified with "According to [vendor name]..." or similar qualifications and should be specific and relevant to the immediate topic of discussion.

Advertising spam will be quickly and ruthlessly removed.