<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ACertificate_Lifecycle</id>
	<title>Talk:Certificate Lifecycle - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ACertificate_Lifecycle"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php?title=Talk:Certificate_Lifecycle&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-10T09:57:57Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.13</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php?title=Talk:Certificate_Lifecycle&amp;diff=1023&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Philippe lhardy: digest of mailling list exchanges</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php?title=Talk:Certificate_Lifecycle&amp;diff=1023&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-05-25T06:41:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;digest of mailling list exchanges&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;I don't believe this is correct: &amp;quot;Certificates are NOT free&amp;quot; Obtaining&lt;br /&gt;
a certificate from a well known Certificate Authority typically&lt;br /&gt;
requires that you pay a fee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
StartCom issues free Class 1 Certificates. The cost is in revocation,&lt;br /&gt;
and Startcom is unique in that they charge on the back side if&lt;br /&gt;
revocation is required, rather than the front side like most CAs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For completeness, Class 1 is the lowest class, while Class 3 or 4 (or&lt;br /&gt;
whatever N they choose - its arbitrary and meant to baffle the&lt;br /&gt;
purchaser) is the highest class. I think &amp;quot;Extended Validation&amp;quot; or EV&lt;br /&gt;
Certificates are usually about a Class 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff&lt;br /&gt;
___&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't believe this is correct: A certificate knows from its creation&lt;br /&gt;
what job it will do. There is no way a certificate issued for&lt;br /&gt;
authenticating a server can be used in a browser to identify a user.&lt;br /&gt;
Certificates have a purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you enforce Basic Constraints, Key Usage (KU), and Extended Key&lt;br /&gt;
Usage (EKU), most PKIs break. Confer: &amp;quot;Code Signing: Breaks for Device&lt;br /&gt;
when enforcing Basic Constraints on WWDR CA,&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
http://openradar.appspot.com/radar?id=3011403. There's tens of&lt;br /&gt;
thousands of other examples.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff&lt;br /&gt;
___&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't believe this is correct: &amp;quot;A Certificate without a private key&lt;br /&gt;
is like glasses without eyes&amp;quot; A certificate does not contain the&lt;br /&gt;
private key. If you have a certificate and you lose your private key,&lt;br /&gt;
then the certificate is unusable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a signing key is retired, a CPS will often state the private key&lt;br /&gt;
is destroyed to ensure no new signatures. The certificate (and its&lt;br /&gt;
public key) are still needed for signature verification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
___&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- &amp;quot;unusable to prove your current identity&amp;quot; - would be better.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do agree with all those remarks; but as usual when doing simplicifications for beginners ( see Category:Beginner ),&lt;br /&gt;
many subtilities are left out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When you face questions like :&lt;br /&gt;
Can i renew a certificate ? And user does not know he needs a private key do so.&lt;br /&gt;
Why my browser refuses to install a Client Certifcate in my browser ? because it is a Certificate and not a PFX containing private key&lt;br /&gt;
Why i can't connect to my server in https even after installing a Certificate ? Because you didn't install a private key...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You quickly understand that in mind of users beginning with Certificate use, Certificate itself means everything needed to prove identity, ownship and anything.&lt;br /&gt;
I fell important to recall that Private Key is the key point of Certificate usage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will put all those comment in Discussion tab of Certificate LifeStyle...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Philippe&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Philippe lhardy</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>